HB 410-FN - AS AMENDED BY THE HOUSE
26Mar2025... 0979h
2025 SESSION
25-0878
11/09
HOUSE BILL 410-FN
SPONSORS: Rep. Read, Rock. 10
COMMITTEE: Housing
-----------------------------------------------------------------
AMENDED ANALYSIS
This bill prohibits the local adoption of extraordinary restrictions on residential property unless the restriction is narrowly tailored to serve a compelling government interest in public health or safety.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in bold italics.
Matter removed from current law appears [in brackets and struckthrough.]
Matter which is either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type.
26Mar2025... 0979h 25-0878
11/09
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twenty Five
AN ACT limiting local authority to adopt restrictions on the building and development of residential properties.
Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened:
1 New Section; Extraordinary Restrictions of Residential Property. Amend RSA 674 by inserting after section 17 the following new section:
674:17-a Extraordinary Restrictions of Residential Property.
I. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the local legislative body of a city, town, or county in which there are located unincorporated towns or unorganized places may adopt an extraordinary restriction of residential property only if the restriction is narrowly tailored to serve a compelling government interest in public health or safety.
II. Evidence such as written findings of fact, scientific studies, or other quantitative and empirical evidence, may be relevant to whether an extraordinary restriction of residential property is narrowly tailored to serve a compelling government interest in public health or safety, but are not necessarily dispositive.
III. For the purposes of this section, “extraordinary restriction of residential property” means any ordinance or regulation that contains any of the following:
(a) Any minimum square footage requirement for a dwelling or unit in excess of 200 square feet or the square footage required to meet the state building code, whichever is greater.
(b) Any lot size requirement greater than 5 gross acres per primary dwelling unit, or greater than 0.5 gross acres per primary dwelling unit if the lot is served by off-site municipal water and sewer systems.
(c) Any road frontage requirement greater than 200 feet per primary dwelling unit, or greater than 50 feet if the lot is served by off-site water and sewer systems.
(d) Prohibition on residential use in areas zoned for commercial use.
(e) Restriction on in-home business use in areas zoned for residential use, provided such business use does not violate noise, pollution, garbage, or light ordinances.
(f) Restriction on whether any dwelling unit is constructed on or off-site.
(g) Local amendments to the state building code or state fire code regarding materials or methods of construction, which impact residential buildings of not more than 4 units.
IV. Upon the effective date of this section, any extraordinary restriction of residential property shall not be enforced unless it meets the requirements of paragraph I.
2 Effective Date. This act shall take effect 180 days after passage.
25-0878
12/28/24
HB 410-FN- FISCAL NOTE
AS INTRODUCED
FISCAL IMPACT:
| ||||
Estimated Political Subdivision Impact | ||||
| FY 2025 | FY 2026 | FY 2027 | FY 2028 |
County Revenue | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
County Expenditures | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Local Revenue | $0 | Indeterminable Decrease | Indeterminable Decrease | Indeterminable Decrease |
Local Expenditures | $0 | Indeterminable Increase | Indeterminable Increase | Indeterminable Increase |
METHODOLOGY:
This bill requires legislative bodies to utilize empirical, scientific evidence to support the adoption or imposition of any extraordinary restriction of residential property unless the legislative body of the municipality finds the ordinance is directly necessary for the health or safety of the community based on evidence published by a non-partisan source. It also includes an appeals process through the Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA).
The New Hampshire Municipal Association indicates that this bill will likely increase municipal expenditures related to amending zoning ordinances, as municipalities may need to hire staff or consultants to identify and review empirical evidence. Restrictions on long-term camping and limiting it to three people could also raise public health-related costs. Additionally, there may be expenses associated with determining the town median household income for variance applications or building permit fees, along with potential lost revenue due to caps on those fees. Consequently, the total impact on municipal expenditures and revenue is indeterminable.
It is assumed that any fiscal impact would occur after FY 2025.
AGENCIES CONTACTED:
New Hampshire Municipal Association